<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Issue With JibberJobber&#8217;s Brand Is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/</link>
	<description>advocacy for the job seeker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:23:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/comment-page-1/#comment-541476</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/archives/1122#comment-541476</guid>
		<description>While I tend to think that we go too far by expecting these things from brands (they don’t have magic powers after all, do they?)…there are brands that make me stop and think for a second.   Harley-Davidson &amp; Apple understand how to deeply connect with people.  They have been able to tap into their own authentic heritage and articulate a point of view that resonates deeply with the values of a certain community.  In some ways, these brands are more about the people who are mesmerized by them than the product itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I tend to think that we go too far by expecting these things from brands (they don’t have magic powers after all, do they?)…there are brands that make me stop and think for a second.   Harley-Davidson &amp; Apple understand how to deeply connect with people.  They have been able to tap into their own authentic heritage and articulate a point of view that resonates deeply with the values of a certain community.  In some ways, these brands are more about the people who are mesmerized by them than the product itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JibberJobber Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brand Confusion and Brand Dilution</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/comment-page-1/#comment-212699</link>
		<dc:creator>JibberJobber Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brand Confusion and Brand Dilution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 13:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/archives/1122#comment-212699</guid>
		<description>[...] The Issue With JibberJobberâ€™s Brand Isâ€¦ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Issue With JibberJobberâ€™s Brand Isâ€¦ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Attig</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/comment-page-1/#comment-172519</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Attig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/archives/1122#comment-172519</guid>
		<description>Jason,

I don&#039;t think JibberJobber needs a brand, JibberJobber is the brand.  What it needs is a defined purpose of being.

Think about some of the .com businesses and their names.

Amazon---What the heck does that have to do with on-line book sales?

Vault--Everyone thinks career related when they hear &quot;Vaultâ€ right?

eHarmony-- Relationships, no, maybe Zen Mediation or Feng Shei

Monster-- Of course, jobs????

Donâ€™t even get me started with Google or Yahooâ€¦â€¦.

I agree with Deb, &quot;What one critical, overriding thing does JJ consistently deliver?&quot; That is the real question and Deb nails it.  

I don&#039;t agree with  Deb&#039;s &quot;alignment&quot; argumment about &quot;Jason/JibberJobber-user chemistry&quot; and don&#039;t think that is valid.  Phil Knight is Nike but Nike is not Phil Knight.  Nike was Bill Bowerman....Phil has simple manned the tiller well.  Bill poured melted rubber into his wife&#039;s waffle iron.

It&#039;s not at all about what you call yourself, it&#039;s what you are and what you offer.  I&#039;ve talked before with you about Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway......

I don&#039;t want to make this too long of a comment but I&#039;ll send you my thoughts and maybe you can consider them for a guest blog.

Best regards,

Brad
MyRetailCareer.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think JibberJobber needs a brand, JibberJobber is the brand.  What it needs is a defined purpose of being.</p>
<p>Think about some of the .com businesses and their names.</p>
<p>Amazon&#8212;What the heck does that have to do with on-line book sales?</p>
<p>Vault&#8211;Everyone thinks career related when they hear &#8220;Vaultâ€ right?</p>
<p>eHarmony&#8211; Relationships, no, maybe Zen Mediation or Feng Shei</p>
<p>Monster&#8211; Of course, jobs????</p>
<p>Donâ€™t even get me started with Google or Yahooâ€¦â€¦.</p>
<p>I agree with Deb, &#8220;What one critical, overriding thing does JJ consistently deliver?&#8221; That is the real question and Deb nails it.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with  Deb&#8217;s &#8220;alignment&#8221; argumment about &#8220;Jason/JibberJobber-user chemistry&#8221; and don&#8217;t think that is valid.  Phil Knight is Nike but Nike is not Phil Knight.  Nike was Bill Bowerman&#8230;.Phil has simple manned the tiller well.  Bill poured melted rubber into his wife&#8217;s waffle iron.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not at all about what you call yourself, it&#8217;s what you are and what you offer.  I&#8217;ve talked before with you about Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to make this too long of a comment but I&#8217;ll send you my thoughts and maybe you can consider them for a guest blog.</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Brad<br />
MyRetailCareer.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/comment-page-1/#comment-162097</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/archives/1122#comment-162097</guid>
		<description>I think a brand should reflect who you are not what you do. Jason you are the Answer. Between this blog and jibberjobber technology there are not many career-related (dare I say life-related) questions left unAnswered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a brand should reflect who you are not what you do. Jason you are the Answer. Between this blog and jibberjobber technology there are not many career-related (dare I say life-related) questions left unAnswered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb Dib</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/comment-page-1/#comment-162021</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb Dib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/archives/1122#comment-162021</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason and Patricia! 

In response to Patricia&#039;s comment, a brand SHOULD typecast a person, but, I respectfully submit,  not in the way Patricia suggests. Patricia, your point is well-taken -- there are many &quot;slashie&quot; people out there, well and happy, with multiple career identities. The difficulty here may be in the perception of what a brand is -- it&#039;s not a profession, it&#039;s not a skill set, it&#039;s not a tag line. A brand is a promise of value -- who you are at your very core, and what that â€œuniquely youâ€ quality presents to the world in the way of value. 

A personal brand transcends professions, or titles, or even reputation. It&#039;s more basic -- like &quot;street cred&quot; meaning it is completely authentic, trusted, and reflects the true individual. Once that uniqueness is established -- the passion and purpose that drives one --  then, and only then can value be discovered / uncovered and refined. 

The delivery of value, supported by the brand is what a value proposition is all about. That&#039;s where the rubber meets the road. Whether you are a writer / actor / photographer, your perceived value â€“ what you offer-- is what typically creates interest. The brand is secondary, but the brand is what often seals the deal -- it&#039;s the trust/emotion component that leads a buyer to choose one equally good product or person over another. A brand alone is unlikely to garner an offer or sale. But the combination of branded value will.

With JibberJobber, the value proposition -- the what JibberJobber really does --  is going to need to be based on the core brand -- the ONE foundational thing that JJ offers to every user, whether job seeker or careerist. But the value proposition needs to further -- it has to tie that intangible branded emotion (often a positive response to the pain a job seeker or careerist feels while navigating uncharted career waters) to the tangible benefits the process and structure JJ offers. What one critical, overriding thing does JJ consistently deliver? And why is that important to users?

So circling back to the beginning, branding really is all about typecasting. In fact a strong brand canâ€™t help but be typecast â€“ and thatâ€™s a good thing because your brand is typically unchanging â€“ it is you, and remains you â€“ your core being â€“ your passion and purpose, solidified into a word, or phrase that is always you. BUT what that brand looks like when you take it to work and/or the marketplace can always change, because your delivery of value changes as marketplace needs change and you adjust your offerings (but not your brand) to meet those new needs. 

The interesting thing about JJ is that is so closely aligned with Jason, so it is not like branding a big name product. It really is about Jason/JJ/JJ-user chemistry. Narrowing down so many attributes of JJ (and Jason, because as inventor / founder / CEO he does represent JJâ€™s brand) is tough. That&#039;s why this is such an interesting (and educational) challenge. 

Respectfully submitted,
Deb Dib, the CEO Coach (and JJ contest sponsor)

&quot;Unabashedly passionate about helping visionary, gutsy, fun executives with a conscience build great careers, mold great companies, and even change the world a bit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason and Patricia! </p>
<p>In response to Patricia&#8217;s comment, a brand SHOULD typecast a person, but, I respectfully submit,  not in the way Patricia suggests. Patricia, your point is well-taken &#8212; there are many &#8220;slashie&#8221; people out there, well and happy, with multiple career identities. The difficulty here may be in the perception of what a brand is &#8212; it&#8217;s not a profession, it&#8217;s not a skill set, it&#8217;s not a tag line. A brand is a promise of value &#8212; who you are at your very core, and what that â€œuniquely youâ€ quality presents to the world in the way of value. </p>
<p>A personal brand transcends professions, or titles, or even reputation. It&#8217;s more basic &#8212; like &#8220;street cred&#8221; meaning it is completely authentic, trusted, and reflects the true individual. Once that uniqueness is established &#8212; the passion and purpose that drives one &#8212;  then, and only then can value be discovered / uncovered and refined. </p>
<p>The delivery of value, supported by the brand is what a value proposition is all about. That&#8217;s where the rubber meets the road. Whether you are a writer / actor / photographer, your perceived value â€“ what you offer&#8211; is what typically creates interest. The brand is secondary, but the brand is what often seals the deal &#8212; it&#8217;s the trust/emotion component that leads a buyer to choose one equally good product or person over another. A brand alone is unlikely to garner an offer or sale. But the combination of branded value will.</p>
<p>With JibberJobber, the value proposition &#8212; the what JibberJobber really does &#8212;  is going to need to be based on the core brand &#8212; the ONE foundational thing that JJ offers to every user, whether job seeker or careerist. But the value proposition needs to further &#8212; it has to tie that intangible branded emotion (often a positive response to the pain a job seeker or careerist feels while navigating uncharted career waters) to the tangible benefits the process and structure JJ offers. What one critical, overriding thing does JJ consistently deliver? And why is that important to users?</p>
<p>So circling back to the beginning, branding really is all about typecasting. In fact a strong brand canâ€™t help but be typecast â€“ and thatâ€™s a good thing because your brand is typically unchanging â€“ it is you, and remains you â€“ your core being â€“ your passion and purpose, solidified into a word, or phrase that is always you. BUT what that brand looks like when you take it to work and/or the marketplace can always change, because your delivery of value changes as marketplace needs change and you adjust your offerings (but not your brand) to meet those new needs. </p>
<p>The interesting thing about JJ is that is so closely aligned with Jason, so it is not like branding a big name product. It really is about Jason/JJ/JJ-user chemistry. Narrowing down so many attributes of JJ (and Jason, because as inventor / founder / CEO he does represent JJâ€™s brand) is tough. That&#8217;s why this is such an interesting (and educational) challenge. </p>
<p>Respectfully submitted,<br />
Deb Dib, the CEO Coach (and JJ contest sponsor)</p>
<p>&#8220;Unabashedly passionate about helping visionary, gutsy, fun executives with a conscience build great careers, mold great companies, and even change the world a bit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2008/02/06/the-issue-with-jibberjobbers-brand-is/comment-page-1/#comment-161927</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/archives/1122#comment-161927</guid>
		<description>Jason, you have a portfolio career which can be repurposed as the need arises. I wonder if branding can &quot;typecast&quot; a person? How would one incorporate flexibility in their brand? I don&#039;t think that it&#039;s unusual these days to be a &quot;slashie&quot; (I think this term was used in the film Zoolander, a slashie is someone who has several different hats, ie, writer/actor/photographer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, you have a portfolio career which can be repurposed as the need arises. I wonder if branding can &#8220;typecast&#8221; a person? How would one incorporate flexibility in their brand? I don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s unusual these days to be a &#8220;slashie&#8221; (I think this term was used in the film Zoolander, a slashie is someone who has several different hats, ie, writer/actor/photographer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

