<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical democrat way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2010/01/29/mr-obama-how-to-create-jobs-the-stereotypical-democrat-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2010/01/29/mr-obama-how-to-create-jobs-the-stereotypical-democrat-way/</link>
	<description>advocacy for the job seeker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:16:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How Governments Solve the Unemployment Problem &#124; JibberJobber Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2010/01/29/mr-obama-how-to-create-jobs-the-stereotypical-democrat-way/comment-page-1/#comment-523035</link>
		<dc:creator>How Governments Solve the Unemployment Problem &#124; JibberJobber Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/?p=3169#comment-523035</guid>
		<description>[...] play in unemployment?  I wrote about this in the following posts (one for Republicans, one for Democrats), and Mike Arrington wrote something similar (for businesses) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] play in unemployment?  I wrote about this in the following posts (one for Republicans, one for Democrats), and Mike Arrington wrote something similar (for businesses) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2010/01/29/mr-obama-how-to-create-jobs-the-stereotypical-democrat-way/comment-page-1/#comment-451625</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/?p=3169#comment-451625</guid>
		<description>Jason, I assume you&#039;re being deliberately stereotypical, but I&#039;m going to respond to a few points anyway.  Contrary to the stereotype, the public sector can contribute to a healthy economy in real ways, not just make-work bureaucracy.  To name the field I&#039;m most familiar with, numerous studies have shown public libraries to deliver a very healthy return on investment to their communities:

http://www.urban.org/publications/1001075.html
http://dpi.wi.gov/pld/econimpact.html

just to link to a couple of sites.  Good public education--which, again contrary to the stereotype, is not normally an oxymoron--from the preschool to the graduate-school level, has contributed hugely to the human capital that has historically been among our society&#039;s greatest resources.  Public goods like roads and transit systems make all the far-flung network of commerce possible, and I suspect that few entrepreneurs would care to have to recruit private contractors to protect their enterprises against crime, save the warehouse if it catches fire, or hear and adjudicate a disputed contract.

To address one more stereotype, the great majority of us hated parasites in the public sector recognize that we are just part of a healthy economy and a healthy society, work as hard and as creatively as most people in private business, and (when we take the time to step back for a wider perspective, which probably most of us in any area of endeavor don&#039;t do often enough) see our work as supporting the equally-vital sectors of private business, nonprofit institutions, and family.

One more peeve, a friendly one as I feel I know you well enough not to suspect malice:  The noun is Democrat.  The adjective is Democratic.  As someone who makes a living partly through the written word, you know the power and importance of language, and to those of us who happen to belong to the party in question, it&#039;s a matter of courtesy.  (For the record, Bill Buckley hated the Democrat-as-adjective construction too.)

Well, there ya go, rant over and time for that second cup of coffee.  Hope I&#039;m not coming off too harsh--I have to admit you did push a couple of buttons, which is not necessarily a bad thing.

--Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, I assume you&#8217;re being deliberately stereotypical, but I&#8217;m going to respond to a few points anyway.  Contrary to the stereotype, the public sector can contribute to a healthy economy in real ways, not just make-work bureaucracy.  To name the field I&#8217;m most familiar with, numerous studies have shown public libraries to deliver a very healthy return on investment to their communities:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.urban.org/publications/1001075.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.urban.org/publications/1001075.html</a><br />
<a href="http://dpi.wi.gov/pld/econimpact.html" rel="nofollow">http://dpi.wi.gov/pld/econimpact.html</a></p>
<p>just to link to a couple of sites.  Good public education&#8211;which, again contrary to the stereotype, is not normally an oxymoron&#8211;from the preschool to the graduate-school level, has contributed hugely to the human capital that has historically been among our society&#8217;s greatest resources.  Public goods like roads and transit systems make all the far-flung network of commerce possible, and I suspect that few entrepreneurs would care to have to recruit private contractors to protect their enterprises against crime, save the warehouse if it catches fire, or hear and adjudicate a disputed contract.</p>
<p>To address one more stereotype, the great majority of us hated parasites in the public sector recognize that we are just part of a healthy economy and a healthy society, work as hard and as creatively as most people in private business, and (when we take the time to step back for a wider perspective, which probably most of us in any area of endeavor don&#8217;t do often enough) see our work as supporting the equally-vital sectors of private business, nonprofit institutions, and family.</p>
<p>One more peeve, a friendly one as I feel I know you well enough not to suspect malice:  The noun is Democrat.  The adjective is Democratic.  As someone who makes a living partly through the written word, you know the power and importance of language, and to those of us who happen to belong to the party in question, it&#8217;s a matter of courtesy.  (For the record, Bill Buckley hated the Democrat-as-adjective construction too.)</p>
<p>Well, there ya go, rant over and time for that second cup of coffee.  Hope I&#8217;m not coming off too harsh&#8211;I have to admit you did push a couple of buttons, which is not necessarily a bad thing.</p>
<p>&#8211;Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical republican way &#124; Career Management Alliance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2010/01/29/mr-obama-how-to-create-jobs-the-stereotypical-democrat-way/comment-page-1/#comment-451362</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical republican way &#124; Career Management Alliance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/?p=3169#comment-451362</guid>
		<description>[...] write two posts in one day but I figured I better close the loop on my last post, which was a suggestion to Obama on how to create jobs the democrat way. Here’s my other-perspective letter: Mr Obama, You say we need to create jobs this year (2010). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] write two posts in one day but I figured I better close the loop on my last post, which was a suggestion to Obama on how to create jobs the democrat way. Here’s my other-perspective letter: Mr Obama, You say we need to create jobs this year (2010). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JibberJobber Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical republican way</title>
		<link>http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/2010/01/29/mr-obama-how-to-create-jobs-the-stereotypical-democrat-way/comment-page-1/#comment-450691</link>
		<dc:creator>JibberJobber Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical republican way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jibberjobber.com/blog/?p=3169#comment-450691</guid>
		<description>[...] Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical republican way January 29th, 2010   I usually don&#8217;t write two posts in one day but I figured I better close the loop on my last post, which was a suggestion to Obama on how to create jobs the democrat way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Obama: How to create jobs the stereotypical republican way January 29th, 2010   I usually don&#8217;t write two posts in one day but I figured I better close the loop on my last post, which was a suggestion to Obama on how to create jobs the democrat way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
